aperture now ships with a built-in applicant tracking system.

now with built-in ats.

compare

aperture vs willo.

willo is a clean, simple one-way video tool aimed at small teams and fast setup. aperture offers a similarly fast setup and adds adaptive conversational interviews plus λ-core scoring so you get signal, not just videos. willo is a recording tool. aperture is a decision tool.

try aperture free talk to us

pick willo if

you want the simplest possible recorder and you're not asking it to actually evaluate anyone.
watching every video yourself counts as a hiring process where you come from.

pick aperture if

you want scoring and ranking, not a pile of videos to review.
you want adaptive conversations, not scripted prompts.
you want an ats included so you don't need a second tool.

side-by-side

how aperture compares to willo.

feature

aperture

willo

ai behavioral interviews

15-minute adaptive, probes deeper based on answers

scripted async video prompts

scoring model

λ-core scoring with confidence intervals across 6 dimensions

manual review

confidence intervals on scores

yes

pool-relative ranking

yes

built-in applicant tracking system

yes

ats integrations

linkedin, greenhouse, ashby, lever, indeed

yes

pricing model

plan-based, never per-interview

contact sales

free tier

yes

candidate data never sold

yes

check provider policy

comparison based on publicly available information as of May 2026. verify details directly on willo.

common questions.

is aperture more than willo?+

yes. willo records videos. aperture runs adaptive interviews, scores candidates with confidence intervals, and manages the pipeline end to end.

what's the cost difference?+

aperture pricing is plan-based with a free tier. willo is also accessibly priced. the real difference is what you get for the money: recordings vs scored shortlists.

also compare

aperture vs other platforms.

one-way video interviewing

aperture vs jobma

budget async video interviewing.

compare

one-way video interviewing

aperture vs hirevue

the legacy incumbent in async video.

compare

ai interviewer

aperture vs micro1

ai recruiter focused on technical interviews.

compare

ai interviewer + marketplace

aperture vs mercor

ai interviews bundled with a talent marketplace.

compare

get started today

hiring intelligence platform.

try demo sign up

free to try · no credit card · instant setup

loading ...

compare

aperture vs willo.

try aperture free talk to us

pick willo if

you want the simplest possible recorder and you're not asking it to actually evaluate anyone.
watching every video yourself counts as a hiring process where you come from.

pick aperture if

you want scoring and ranking, not a pile of videos to review.
you want adaptive conversations, not scripted prompts.
you want an ats included so you don't need a second tool.

side-by-side

how aperture compares to willo.

feature

aperture

willo

ai behavioral interviews

15-minute adaptive, probes deeper based on answers

scripted async video prompts

scoring model

λ-core scoring with confidence intervals across 6 dimensions

manual review

confidence intervals on scores

yes

pool-relative ranking

yes

built-in applicant tracking system

yes

ats integrations

linkedin, greenhouse, ashby, lever, indeed

yes

pricing model

plan-based, never per-interview

contact sales

free tier

yes

candidate data never sold

yes

check provider policy

comparison based on publicly available information as of May 2026. verify details directly on willo.

common questions.

is aperture more than willo?+

yes. willo records videos. aperture runs adaptive interviews, scores candidates with confidence intervals, and manages the pipeline end to end.

what's the cost difference?+

aperture pricing is plan-based with a free tier. willo is also accessibly priced. the real difference is what you get for the money: recordings vs scored shortlists.

also compare