aperture now ships with a built-in applicant tracking system.

now with built-in ats.

compare

aperture vs jobma.

jobma offers cheap async video interviewing for cost-sensitive teams. aperture replaces scripted video with adaptive ai interviews, adds λ-core scoring, and ships an ats. if you want the cheapest video tool, jobma works. if you want signal that makes hiring decisions easier, aperture wins.

try aperture free talk to us

pick jobma if

the cheapest option wins every time, and you've talked yourself into believing the signal is the same.
scripted video and a recruiter watching all of it is, to you, a real evaluation.

pick aperture if

you want adaptive interviews with real scoring, not scripted videos to watch.
you want an ats built in so you don't need a second tool.
you want a free tier to start and plan pricing that doesn't punish growth.

side-by-side

how aperture compares to jobma.

feature

aperture

jobma

ai behavioral interviews

15-minute adaptive, probes deeper based on answers

scripted async video prompts

scoring model

λ-core scoring with confidence intervals across 6 dimensions

manual review

confidence intervals on scores

yes

pool-relative ranking

yes

built-in applicant tracking system

yes

ats integrations

linkedin, greenhouse, ashby, lever, indeed

yes

pricing model

plan-based, never per-interview

contact sales

free tier

yes

candidate data never sold

yes

check provider policy

comparison based on publicly available information as of May 2026. verify details directly on jobma.

common questions.

is aperture more expensive than jobma?+

depends on plan. aperture has a free tier and plan pricing that doesn't scale per-interview. for many teams, the total cost is similar and the signal is much better.

why move off budget video tools?+

manual video review eats recruiter hours. scored shortlists eliminate that step entirely.

also compare

aperture vs other platforms.

one-way video interviewing

aperture vs myinterview

async video with ai shortlisting.

compare

one-way video interviewing

aperture vs hirevue

the legacy incumbent in async video.

compare

ai interviewer

aperture vs micro1

ai recruiter focused on technical interviews.

compare

ai interviewer + marketplace

aperture vs mercor

ai interviews bundled with a talent marketplace.

compare

get started today

hiring intelligence platform.

try demo sign up

free to try · no credit card · instant setup

loading ...

compare

aperture vs jobma.

try aperture free talk to us

pick jobma if

the cheapest option wins every time, and you've talked yourself into believing the signal is the same.
scripted video and a recruiter watching all of it is, to you, a real evaluation.

pick aperture if

you want adaptive interviews with real scoring, not scripted videos to watch.
you want an ats built in so you don't need a second tool.
you want a free tier to start and plan pricing that doesn't punish growth.

side-by-side

how aperture compares to jobma.

feature

aperture

jobma

ai behavioral interviews

15-minute adaptive, probes deeper based on answers

scripted async video prompts

scoring model

λ-core scoring with confidence intervals across 6 dimensions

manual review

confidence intervals on scores

yes

pool-relative ranking

yes

built-in applicant tracking system

yes

ats integrations

linkedin, greenhouse, ashby, lever, indeed

yes

pricing model

plan-based, never per-interview

contact sales

free tier

yes

candidate data never sold

yes

check provider policy

comparison based on publicly available information as of May 2026. verify details directly on jobma.

common questions.

is aperture more expensive than jobma?+

depends on plan. aperture has a free tier and plan pricing that doesn't scale per-interview. for many teams, the total cost is similar and the signal is much better.

why move off budget video tools?+

manual video review eats recruiter hours. scored shortlists eliminate that step entirely.

also compare